As I discussed in class, I do not disclose or discuss grades
via email. Should you have any question
concerning your grade(s), please send me a message after the start of the
Spring semester and we will meet to discuss your grade or any other concerns
you may have. Please understand I do not
change any grade unless I have made a calculation error. Have a Happy Holiday! Rick Custin
Current Edition- California Business Practice
The Peacemaker Quarterly- April 2014
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
Friday, September 6, 2013
Attorney Client Privilege Survives Death of Client
The issue of whether the attorney client privilege survives the death of a client was discussed in class. The following provides us with an answer to this question:
"Despite the scholarly criticism, we think there are weighty reasons that counsel in favor of posthumous application. Knowing that communications will remain confidential even after death encourages the client to communicate fully and frankly with counsel. While the fear of disclosure, and the consequent withholding of information from counsel, may be reduced if disclosure is limited to posthumous disclosure in a criminal context, it seems unreasonable to assume that it vanishes altogether. Clients may be concerned about reputation, civil liability, or possible harm to friends or family. Posthumous disclosure of such communications may be a feared as disclosure during the client's lifetime." Swidler & Berlin v. United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998)
Prior to the 1998 Supreme Court decision a majority of courts but not all recognized that the attorney client privilege did survive the death of a client. Should the privilege survive?
"Despite the scholarly criticism, we think there are weighty reasons that counsel in favor of posthumous application. Knowing that communications will remain confidential even after death encourages the client to communicate fully and frankly with counsel. While the fear of disclosure, and the consequent withholding of information from counsel, may be reduced if disclosure is limited to posthumous disclosure in a criminal context, it seems unreasonable to assume that it vanishes altogether. Clients may be concerned about reputation, civil liability, or possible harm to friends or family. Posthumous disclosure of such communications may be a feared as disclosure during the client's lifetime." Swidler & Berlin v. United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998)
Prior to the 1998 Supreme Court decision a majority of courts but not all recognized that the attorney client privilege did survive the death of a client. Should the privilege survive?
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
There has been a lot of controversy brewing from the Asiana Airlines flight 214 crash-landing that broke the plane apart and burst into flames short of the runway, killing 2 and leaving 180 passengers injured. The Air Line Pilot's Association International (ALAP) says that "the federal agency handling the investigation of Saturday's passenger jet crash in San Francisco had released too much information too quickly, which could lead to wrong conclusions and compromise safety". In a statement from Monday, ALAP stated "releasing data from the flight's black boxes without full investigative information for context encourages wild speculation about the cause of the crash". If this is the case, the public, across the globe, would have enormous doubts about the safety presented to them by Asiana aircraft, and therefore hinder their actions with choosing Asiana in their future aircraft travels. I believe it is best to complete a thorough investigation that uncovers the real causes of the crash, before disclosing the information to the public, in order to decrease false speculation.
Full article: http://www.nbcnews.com/travel/pilots-union-says-probe-asiana-crash-revealed-too-much-too-6C10582948
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)